Responses of macaque MT/V5 neurons to incoherent stochastic dot patterns: repeated vs. variable seeds | ||||
KENNETH H. BRITTEN1, MICHAEL N. SHADLEN1, WILLIAM T. NEWSOME1, J. ANTHONY MOVSHON2 | ||||
1Howard Hughes Medical Institute Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine Fairchild Bldg., Room D-209 Stanford, CA 94305 2Center for Neural Science New York University 4 Washington Place, Room 809 New York, NY 10003 Support: National Eye Institute, EY-5603, EY-2017; McKnight Development Award to W.T.N; NIH training grant NS 07158-11, K.H.B. |
ANIMAL | Macaca mulatta |
PREP | awake, fixation, discrimination |
DATA TYPE | extracellular spike times |
CELL TYPE | V5/MT cells |
N | 26 cells |
Summary
This data set contains responses to repeated presentations of particular incoherent, random dot patterns. Specific analysis of this data is described in Bair and Koch (1996). The data for each neuron are presented here in two files, one containing trials where the randomization seed was varied from trial to trial (file name ending in v) and one where the randomization seed was held constant (file name ending in c). Each trial has two variable parameters, direction and response. The direction value has no meaning by itself because the dots were incoherent, thus there was no directional signal. The response value indicates whether the subject chose the "correct" or "incorrect" direction, meaning the direction assigned to the trial, even though direction has no influence on the stimulus pattern (0-wrong, 1-correct). These trials were interleaved with higher coherence trials, thus the subject had incentive to work and did not know that these were zero-coherence trials. All data files are from subject e.Stimulus
The stimulus was a sparse, dynamic random dot pattern lasting for typically 2 seconds. The motion coherence was zero. A full description of the stimulus is provided in Britten et al. (1992).
Electrophysiological Methods
Britten KH, Shadlen MN, Newsome WT, Movshon JA (1992) The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. J Neurosci 12:4745-4765.
Published analyses